SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




EDITORIAL
Engagement? It's Asean’s Shame
Tuesday, November 3, 2009

COMMENTS (11)
RECOMMEND (31)
E-MAIL
PRINT

During the recent summit meeting in Thailand of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) we witnessed the usual handshakes and smiles on the summit podium.
 
However, behind this front of unity, some civil society groups in the region were shunned, while cronies of the Asean governments and Burma’s repressive regime, were invited to attend an interface meeting between government officials and other civil society groups.
 
Despite this shocking compromise, some officials claimed the summit was a success.
 
The sad fact is that Asean remains a club where bureaucrats, politicians and generals who commit crimes against humanity have little respect for their own citizens. To be blunt, Asean leaders remain ignorant about Burma, if not ill-informed.
 
Recently, we heard a wishful and naïve comment from Asean Secretary General Surin Pitsuwan, who was dubbed a shining star when he became Thai foreign minister in 1997.
 
Surin told the Voice of America that Washington's willingness to talk with the Burmese junta opened a “new ball game” for the region. Countries in Southeast Asia were looking forward to seeing adjustments from both sides, he said.
 
“This is a new opportunity. And, all of us in Asean, every member state, recognizes this new opportunity," Surin said. "I think Myanmar [Burma] itself recognizes that this is a golden opportunity for engagement, for interaction, for dialogue, which is well and good. And, I think it's going to be good for the region.”
 
Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said Asean was pleased that the United States, which maintains strict sanctions against Burma, was now following its lead in trying to engage the junta.
 
“The one thing we all agreed on is that we welcome signs of further engagement in response to some developments in Burma. Asean has always argued that engagement is the right approach,” Abhisit said.
 
We all cautiously welcomed the Washington’s new approach to Burma. However, many remained skeptical whether the regime will make any major concession.
 
In reality, Kurt Campbell, assistant secretary of state for Southeast Asia, who is now in Burma meeting regime officials and opposition leaders, cautioned that it will be a step-by-step process and that engagement with Burma will be long and painful.
 
Let’s make it crystal clear once and for all that Asean’s past and present engagement policy with the brutal regime in Burma has gone nowhere. So it is not worth taking credit. Instead, Asean should look at itself in the mirror.
 
Asean’s engagement policy with Burma is rather one of appeasement and economic engagement, exploiting Burma’s natural resources.
 
In return, the regime leaders, who have killed thousands of innocent people and Buddhist monks and keep politicians and activists in jails, conveniently hide behind the Asean shield.
 
At last month’s Asean summit, many media observers and journalists thought that the grouping has allowed the regime to walk away scot-free.
 
Abhisit denied that the group had softened its stance on Burma, having previously issued direct appeals for the release of all political prisoners, including Suu Kyi.
 
“It is not true,” he said. “It was discussed. Everybody agrees that we should help Burma move forward in completing their roadmap so that it will lead to democracy.”
 
Abhisit’s statement again showed Asean’s wishful thinking on the regime’s intentions and its “road map.” It is the constitution that Asean leaders and US leaders should question, because the document only prolongs military rule in Burma. It is a death sentence for many Burmese and ethnic nationalities. 
  
In order to keep its credibility and stance, Asean should spell out its own stand on Burma.
 
It is important that Asean should make clear to Burmese leaders that it will join the US’s financial and targeted sanctions against the regime leaders and their cronies if they fail to take meaningful steps.
 
Surin Pitsuwan and Asean have a golden opportunity in view of the approaching summit meeting in Singapore between Asean and the US, to be attended by US President Barack Obama. 
 
Asean must take a stand and be firm on Burma, demonstrating that the regional grouping’s credibility and reputation are at stake because of the brutal nature of the Burmese regime.
 
Surin and Asean leaders should come out and challenge the regime to free political prisoners and Suu Kyi and make meaningful political progress towards national reconciliation. The Burmese junta should be told that the new ball game is based on reward and punishment.



COMMENTS (11)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
13/11/2009
Ko Oo Mg Gyi,

I tend to concur with you by this statement by Jeffrey Bader:

“The statement we're trying to make here is that we're not going to let the Burmese tail wag the Asean dog,” he said. "We're going to meet with all 10 [Asean members] and we're not going to punish the other nine simply because Burma is in the room, but this is not a bilateral."

I differ with you on SPCD interest. In the xenophobic mind of #1 I doubt US input does not matter beyond at this point after 2 decades of failure.

It is the US that will need to hook #1 with a genuine lure. At least ASEAN and China make no secret about self economic advantages.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
11/11/2009
Asean is small fish. Snr. Genral Than Shwe would like to catch supper fish. So the junta will never, ever listen to Asean's voice. The junta has just used Asean many times and benefited from it when it was isolated by the Western powers. Now that the junta has become friends with America, why should it care about Asean?

plan B Wrote:
05/11/2009
For fairness sake, S. Korea and Singapore have been "giving" much after benefiting from the "vacuums". Even Taiwan and Japan, whose stakes are minimal in the "advantages", contributed.

What have Thailand and China done for their share? Hmm. At least China can claim it has provided "cover" for the SPDC in the UN Security Council.

Nat Ka Lay Wrote:
05/11/2009
How long will ASEAN keep its shameful stance, making positive comments and friendly excuses when it deals with the disgraceful Burmese regime.

I get fed up with this naive organization whenever it gives excuses to hide its pettiness and indignity on its approach on Burma.

ASEAN's positive engagement is a directionless policy going nowhere proclaimed by an internally disunited organization.

It has never been reluctant to show its meaningless smile even though the Junta has spat on them several times.

Its members are intrinsically so different that one can wonder why this organization exists at all or why they still throw a lot of dollars every year for nothing.

Now, they are cautiously watching for an opportunity to jump in at the expense of the US. What is Asean if not opportunist?

plan B Wrote:
04/11/2009
Dr Lee Jones,

Your points are all factually correct.
However, taking advantage of the "economic vacuums" created does not entitle one not to address the negative result of the advantages. The IDPs, refugees, etc.

Taking advantage of "a very one-sided" term?
Will you care to address that issue?

Max Wrote:
04/11/2009
Timothy, you are right about ASEAN being a talkfest short on courage if its leaders look only to adopt a "soft" approach on the Burmese military.

But the Commonwealth has little relevance these days too. Suspension has not stopped Mugabe destroying Zimbabwe's economy, resources or people, and a power sharing arrangement is in place with Morgan Tsvangirai of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change

Like Burma, Zimbabwe was once rich, and known as Africa's breadbasket. Like the junta, all Mugabe has to do is re-hash the "corrupt colonial rulers" speech and a few anti-Western slogans, and the population is forced to dance to his tune.

Scraping Mugabe off the Commonwealth's list is like peeling dead skin from a carcass.

It would not be surprising if Mugabe and Than Shwe are best friends.

Vantlang Mualcin Wrote:
04/11/2009
ASEAN is no more than an organization of prostitution. What can we expect since Than Shwe was called "Older brother" by one of the ASEAN's leaders? The image of ASEAN brings nothing to me but corruption.

Kthee Wrote:
04/11/2009
To put it bluntly, MONEY talks and blank walks, that is what most of these Asean leaders are.

Asean is Club Evil where these heartless corrupt leaders congregate, focusing on economic opportunism.

The Amazing thing is our Mr. Than Shwe with a 10th grade education has got these Ivy leaguers like Mr Surin Pitsuwan on his leash. With ill begotten Billions deposited in SG Banks, and using our natural resources as bate, he has got them in the palm of his hands.

We are tired of their lip service to cover up their shameful and corrupt ways. We Burmese people know who our friends and enemies are. The day will come when we can name all of them and expose their illicit deals with the Junta.

Asean leaders will reap what they sow if they continue to use material approach at the expense of the helpless disadvantaged poor and oppressed people.

It's sad and pitiful to see these Ivy league educated leaders spiritually and morally bankrupt.





plan B Wrote:
04/11/2009
There is a very good article that might make ASEAN a player again without having to reckon their past:
http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2009/10/10/coordinated-approach-necessary-burma

Dr Lee Jones Wrote:
03/11/2009
This article is riddled with the usual cliched errors on ASEAN's Burma policy.

1. ASEAN has not merely appeased and exploited Burma. ASEAN states have made real efforts to encourage Burma to liberalise somewhat. They failed, but ASEAN did try, within limits.

2. Burma cannot hide behind an ASEAN "shield". ASEAN offers virtually no protection to the regime. In 2005 Burma was forced to skip its turn to chair ASEAN, and ASEAN refused to oppose a US-tabled UN Security Council resolution against Burma. ASEAN leaders have repeatedly tried to engage China and India to pressurise the junta. The suppression of the monks' uprising was harshly criticised by ASEAN. ASEAN forced Burma to accept foreign aid after cyclone Nargis. Blaming ASEAN for Burma's situation deflects attention from the weakness of Burma's divided internal opposition.

3. Why should ASEAN join the West's failed sanctions against Burma, which even the NLD have now come out against?

More at http://tinyurl.com/yzeos5q

timothy Wrote:
03/11/2009
Asean regions are made up of corruptions, nepotisms, bribery, financial embezzlements, to name a few despite having the questionable democracies in some of the leading Asean nations. They only interest in sucking the blood and reaping the natural resources of Burma in co-operation with murderous junta.
I've got no trust in Asean leaders at all. They are hopelessly corrupted and one day if Burma gain independence, she will stay away from dirty Asean. We will join the Commonwealth, which had the courage to suspend murderous Mugabe from the group.



More Articles in This Section

bullet Asean’s Never-ending Struggle for Relevance

bullet Halfway to a Handshake

bullet Don’t Let the Junta off the Hook

bullet Impotent China

bullet Tension in the North

bullet Webb’s Tangled Message

bullet Lay Off the Lady

bullet Clinton’s Flawed Burma Message

bullet Ban—Empty-handed But Wiser

bullet The World is Ready for a President Aung San Suu Kyi


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.