SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




EDITORIAL
Impotent China
Saturday, August 29, 2009

COMMENTS (17)
RECOMMEND (83)
E-MAIL
PRINT

The increased tension and fighting between Burmese troops and ethnic armies along the Sino-Burmese border has sent thousands of refugees fleeing to China. This has prompted Chinese foreign ministry officials to express hope that Burma can “properly deal with its domestic issue to safeguard the regional stability of its bordering area with China.”

Authorities in the southeastern Chinese province of Yunnan say some 10,000 people have already fled across the border from Burma in recent days due to the recent clashes. Most are Burmese-born Chinese and Chinese nationals living along the border.

Over the past few months, Beijing has been engaging in quiet diplomacy with Naypyidaw to urge the Burmese junta to solve the ethnic issue along the border in a peaceful way. When Gen Maung Aye visited Beijing in June, Chinese leaders again requested him not to use force against ethnic ceasefire groups and to maintain stability there.

Burmese leaders are also reportedly unhappy, as Chinese continue to support ethnic groups along the border. Many Burmese military leaders harbor anti-China sentiments, as China has in the past heavily backed ethnic armies and the now defunct Communist Party of Burma (CPB). The Wa and Chinese from the Kokang region were former members of the CPB.

However, it seems the Burmese leaders did not listen to China’s advice. Instead, the regime went ahead with plans to press the ethnic groups near the border to disarm and form border guard forces. The regime aims to complete this transformation before elections are held next year.

The current conflict has been 20 years in the making. It is a direct result of the regime’s refusal to grant the ethnic ceasefire groups the self-determination they seek within the framework of a federal union.

The greatest irony of this situation is that China, a major arms supplier and staunch ally of the repressive regime for the past two decades, has proven to be impotent in its efforts to persuade the junta leaders to find a political solution to this issue.

China has consistently backed the regime at the UN Security Council, exercising its veto power to block resolutions condemning the regime for its brutal repression of dissent, arguing that these actions do not represent a threat to international security.

In early August, Chinese foreign ministry officials even defended the regime’s decision to sentence detained Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi to a further 18 months under house arrest, saying that the international community must respect Burma’s judicial sovereignty.

After decades of defending the junta, China’s leaders are learning the hard way that the Burmese junta’s sole concern is its own self-preservation. It cares as little about what Beijing wants as it does about the democratic aspirations of Burma’s people.

Like it or not, Beijing’s approach to Burma—and its status as an emerging superpower—is being put to the test. Unless it can find a way to rein in the generals, China risks not only instability along its border with Burma, but also appearing to be powerless to defend its own interests.



COMMENTS (17)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
08/09/2009
'Then, thanks to the DASSK lovers' anonymous lies, protests and litigation, the focus for the people's freedom was equated with DASSK's wellbeing!'

Thanks for making it clear where your allegiance really lies. Thanks to your generals for turning the country into a 'Banana Republic' by their behavior and actions.

'What do you think should happen next?'
It's not going to be what you wish for - a 'Thousand Year Reich' of the generals. We shall overcome as surely as day follows night.

plan B Wrote:
07/09/2009
Ko Me Aung
Spineless, can't touch the generals etc!
Did you really forget to put the "your" in front of the "general?"
It would have been simpler if the West had taken orders from DASSK.
As it is, the West is the main culprit of using sanctions. Initially, to make SLORC cower to the '88 legitimate electoral consensus. A typical Banana Republic approach.
It never worked even if the motive is democracy, freedom, etc.
Then, thanks to the DASSK lovers' anonymous lies, protests and litigation, the focus for the people's freedom was equated with DASSK's wellbeing!
The inexcusable idiocy of equating DASSK with the people is entirely the fault of the West listening to this self serving industry.
As for the SPDC, the de facto government do not really help with their hammer to nail approach to everything.
Spilt milk as it is, as DASSK is still jail, The SPDC is still at its worst, and the West is still using the same useless tactic.
What do you think should happen next?

Moe Aung Wrote:
05/09/2009
plan B,

'Tell me which will be the most logical and easiest one to "take care off' in order to break this cycle?'

The spineless path of least resistance, eh? Or is it the lower ground where the proverbial javelin strikes? Of course, you can't touch the generals. Oh no, plan B won't allow it. And the West? They take their orders from ASSK according to plan B. What impeccable logic!

plan B Wrote:
03/09/2009
Aside from the "Characterization on my take" there is absolutely no disagreement on all your factual assertions and interpretation of SPDC.

Choosing only facts that will prove your point without considering associating factors is my consistent gripe concerning your "tree for the forest" position that you have chosen to take.

The forest here are mainly the west acts of past 20+ years. The trees are all the well known proven facts that is continuing right to this moments in Myanmar.And will continue continue the cycle until broken.

Simply put the obvious elements in this cycle that gave unending misery to the people are:
1) SPDC and associated problems created.
2)The oppositions mainly NLD and DASSK
3) The West useless interferences.

Tell me which will be the most logical and easiest one to "take care off' in order to break this cycle?

Moe Aung Wrote:
03/09/2009
plan B,

The junta can hardly claim with a straight face they are anti-narcotics when they've themselves been instrumental over a long period of time in turning their own country into a narco-state, not a few of their commanders cashing in on the trade.

The double standards have been the norm under military rule; you could get away with murder literally when you are in favor, but they'll come down on you like a ton of bricks as soon as you cross them one way or another.

The way they've dealt with the drug barons is not just hypocrisy, but a good example of watering the proverbial poison plant or, if you prefer, raising a monster, not unlike the US vis-a-vis the Taliban and Bin Laden. (The Burmese communists have learnt their lesson the hard way too from their dependence on Kokang and Wa chieftains.) Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

Tide Wrote:
02/09/2009
Hi Moe Aung,

Keep crying and moaning about how the country has been destroyed by the current and previous governments.

Whatever happens in Myanmar or to you personally, it is all about governments' fault. The military government and the BSPP are evil gods because they torture everyone in the country.

Cry..... baby..... cry...... cry out loud as much as you can.

plan B Wrote:
02/09/2009
Ko Moe Aung
Good response however aren't you just a little hypocritical going as far back as KMT-CIA connection but refusing to recognize the SPDC is a continuation of these historical events you use brilliantly to chastise Tide?
An inconvenient truth?
The last I heard Al Gore is looking for someone to promote his DVD.

Plan B Wrote:
01/09/2009
Eric Johnston

As usual your hatred driven "anything but SPDC" blinded you to the fact that China is for China.
As such neither the people of Burma's plight really register in their resource starved mind.
If you even fantasize that China respects the international consensus than you are simply suggesting current intolerable Status Quo. When was the last time China vetoed and thus maintaining the useless interferences of the West?

Moe Aung Wrote:
31/08/2009
Tide,

'After all, this is a combined tactic between China and Myanmar to get rid off drug dealers.'

But taking their own sweet time in getting rid of the drug barons with convenient detours along the way.

'Using the self-determination card, how long have Kokangs been in the contemporary drug trade? Since KMT were supported by the CIA?'

How long? Since Ne Win nurtured the Kokang Kakweyay (Defense) Force and turned a blind eye to their business activities, not just the KMT/CIA. His protegee simply followed in his footsteps.

Pe Myint Wrote:
31/08/2009
What China should do now is to put aside its short-term interest and join in with the international community to stitch up the regime.

Moe Aung Wrote:
31/08/2009
Seeking a political solution in Burma under the generals appears harder than finding the holy grail.Not China,nor anyone else will succeed in persuading the junta in that direction.

That's exactly why all the peoples of Burma must unite and overthrow the military dictatorship.Material help can then be offered by other states where all diplomatic efforts have failed to make a dent in the junta's resolve to hold on to power at any cost and by all means.

plan B,

'Ever occur to Irrawaddy that Webb's visit has made SPDC to choose this round of conflicts?'

Whilst Webb's visit went the way the junta wanted,it can't be taken as a green light for the renewed conflict on the Chinese border which was pre-planned and based on strategic military thinking.

'Equating DASSK continued incarceration as the problem once solved will bring Nivana to Myanmar.'

It won't but it's the first step to reconciliation and must include others.

'Help the people to help themselves'in freeing themselves.

Ngal Hriang Wrote:
30/08/2009
China has been on the wrong side for the past many years. Now China learns a lesson that Than Shwe is not the one who tries to rebuild Burma but he who keeps destroying.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
30/08/2009
The Chinese, with all their investments in Burma, now seen to be the hostage of a cunning but demented bunch of armed robbers who bow only to superior force, and then only when exercised.

China's real interests will be better served by a government that respects international treaties and law, and that fosters genuine international development.

Regional cooperation and development favours Chinese interests, but the Burmese generals put a firm brake upon this.

tocharian Wrote:
30/08/2009
Is the following true?

China is strong, all-knowing, and wise, propelled by the strength of two billion loyal hands, including those that now live in Kokang, Hpakant, Mandalay, Singpore, San Fransisco and Vancouver, all pulling together as one under the Great Celestial Bureaucracy high above.

Experts all agree that there can be no question of this claim, as this claim is the truth. Burma should be proud and thankful to be protected by this Great Nation and learn about the Glorious Han Civilzation.

plan B Wrote:
30/08/2009
"Unless it can find a way to rein in the generals". Fallacies:

1)Not recognizing The mentality of SPDC
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6479/is_3_30/ai_n31178685/

This article will clearly show SPDC mentality, China's historic intentions, and West useless interferences that promote SPDC intransigence.

2)Asserting China's importance in DASSK's well being.

Remember Depayin? It did not even register in the China quest for Myanmar resources. Yettaw trumped up is just going to make SPDC look resourceful to PRC.

3) Ever occur to Irrawaddy that Webb's visit has made SPDC to choose this round of conflicts?

4) Borderguard concept is flawed as is the RMTD. Never seen Irrawaddy comment on the pros and cons. Will Irrawaddy care for a Borderguard 101?

5) Equating DASSK continued incarceration as the problem once solved will bring Nivana to Myanmar. DASSK's suffering is nothing compared to other less well know political prisoners and the most vulnerable.

Help the people to help themselves.

DM Wrote:
29/08/2009
We can only hope that the Chinese would learn it the very hard way and will lose face in the international arena. If one country deserves to be punished for their actions it is China.

Tide Wrote:
29/08/2009
Why has ASSK been brought up here in this editorial? Why is she being used for every issue? If you use her or her story for every little issue, she will not graduate from "secretary" status or perhaps her role will go down to the general labour staus.

After all, this is a combined tactic between China and Myanmar to get rid off drug dealers. Using the self-determination card, how long have Kokangs been in the contemporary drug trade? Since KMT were supported by the CIA?



More Articles in This Section

bullet Engagement? It's Asean’s Shame

bullet Asean’s Never-ending Struggle for Relevance

bullet Halfway to a Handshake

bullet Don’t Let the Junta off the Hook

bullet Tension in the North

bullet Webb’s Tangled Message

bullet Lay Off the Lady

bullet Clinton’s Flawed Burma Message

bullet Ban—Empty-handed But Wiser

bullet The World is Ready for a President Aung San Suu Kyi


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.