SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




Dissidents Expect Little from US Visit


By SAW YAN NAING Tuesday, November 3, 2009

COMMENTS (7)
RECOMMEND (22)
E-MAIL
PRINT

Most Burmese dissidents, activists and ethnic leaders believe the visit of a US delegation to Burma is positive, but do not expect any major political concessions on the part of the Burmese military regime to come from the talks.

Several dissidents have voiced their opinions, generally saying that the visit may be beneficial to the regime, but not to Burma’s opposition groups. 

The US delegation, led by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell, arrived on Tuesday morning in Burma’s capital, Naypyidaw, where it met with Burmese government officials.

According to diplomatic sources, Campbell is accompanied by Deputy Assistant Secretary for Southeast Asia Scot Marciel, the US State Department’s Burma Officer Laura Scheible and another State Department officer.

On Wednesday, the delegation will fly to Rangoon to meet representatives of various ethnic groups and leaders of the opposition National League for Democracy, including Aung San Suu Kyi. 

One of the invited ethnic leaders, Aye Tha Aung, the chairman of the Arakan League for Democracy, said he hopes the US representatives learn more about the political landscape of Burma as they meet with representatives of the regime, the opposition and the ethnic groups.  

“However, I am not hopeful of political improvement, because the regime refuses to hold tripartite dialogue [between the junta, the opposition political parties and the ethnic groups],” he said.

Political improvement will only come when there is a tripartite dialogue, and it doesn’t matter what the US does,” he said, adding that the Burmese regime only seeks better relations with the US as a means to lift economic sanctions. 

Regional human rights activist Debbie Stothard, who is the coordinator of Altsean-Burma, said, “This trip is going to be the first real test of the new US policy … We want to see a genuine outcome.”  

She said that an improvement in Burma’s political climate can only be measured by three criteria: the unconditional release of political prisoners, including Suu Kyi; an end to military conflict, war crimes and crimes against ethnic minorities; and a move toward tripartite dialogue.  

Hla Ngwe, the joint secretary (1) of the Karen National Union, said, “If the US delegation is allowed by the junta to hear and discuss the demands of ethnic groups, dissidents and opposition parties, then a degree of success may be measured.

However, he said he doubted whether the talks would be productive as key government decision-maker Snr-Gen Than Shwe will miss the meeting.

Speaking to The Irrawaddy on Tuesday, a Wa official in Wa capital Panghsang said he does not believe the US can persuade the Burmese regime of the need for a political process. He said the political conflict in Burma is a domestic problem that can only be solved by the parties involved.

“We all want peace and that’s what we hope for,” he said. “But so much depends on the will of the Burmese junta.”

Campbell’s delegation is the first occasion for the Obama administration to negotiate with the Burmese junta since it announced in September it would engage with the regime though continue to impose economic sanctions.  



COMMENTS (7)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
04/11/2009
Mike Lewis,

"Cynically, it could be about the US fears of a robust and dominant China lurking in the background and oil. But at least it's a positive step."

I am hoping the present interest of the US goes above and beyond the DPRK. This is a chance for the US to remake Myanmar through diplomacy used in the Middle East.

Between promises of:
1) A good SPDC exist strategy.
2) Appropriate aid and trade to immediately lessen the suffering of the most vulnerable.
3) Bridging the differences between SPDC and ethnic groups.
4) Advising the opposition of the reality of the need to engage at a minor level.

These proper objectives can all be achieved with an attitude without regards for incidences that presently will act as detractors.

China's apparent laissez faire approach should be recognized and used for advancing the needed agenda in Burma.

It took 20+ years to descend to this present quagmire. With the Burmese citizenry's ingenuity, it won't take take that long to fix.

tocharian Wrote:
04/11/2009
In a way, "Burmese dissidents and ethnics", especially those who live in "political asylum" outside of Burma are becoming more and more irrelevant.

The US, China, Korea, India, Thailand, the military junta AND ASSK are calling the shots. Burma's future will not be decided by "exile dissidents". ASSK, who still is in Burma, is the only dissident that really counts, because she is the only Burmese icon in the West and Than Shwe knows that!

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
04/11/2009
As long as UWSA plays proxy to China there will be no peace for them, trust me.
Of course the Campbell mission is only a fact finding one and will not count much.

Than Shwe has no mind or desire to settle things in a right and amicable way as evidenced since day one. He went to this length just to play off China and US and find out how he stands to gain out of the venture.

Of course he is not abandoning China; the green light is given for China's pipeline while Campbell is sent wheezing his way in Burma's political maze today.

As long as the US talks about freedom, democracy, human rights, rule of law etc. there is no way it can build a bridge or engage with the beavers at Nay Pyi Daw.

If US can swap for lifting sanctions with investments in Burma then it could be a different story.

Campbell's dream - engagement with Burma - is doomed from day one unless he tows Than Shwe's line.

In this is what happens, Daw Suu and her people will be the only losers in this unfair game no doubt.

mike lewis Wrote:
04/11/2009
This is a fact finding mission. Nothing of substance will come out of these meetings for a while, if they continue, that is.

This isn't about building a political process, which I doubt would happen with economic sanctions in place.

And in any case the solution, when it comes, will be a domestic Burmese solution not a Western dominated one, which it should be anyway.

Cynically, it could be about the US fears of a robust and dominant China lurking in the background and OIL. But at least its a positive step.

plan B Wrote:
03/11/2009
“But so much depends on the will of the Burmese junta.”

Tread lightly, tread gently, tread carefully and most of all tread thoughtfully for the sake of the 50 millions hostages.

TWGG Wrote:
03/11/2009
These are probably the same dissidents who dance to the tune of the Thai army and intelligence departments.

timothy Wrote:
03/11/2009
Yes, you have to point the gun to Than Shwe`s head or similar life-threatening measures to motivate him to commit to genuine peace talks. America can send a missile to Than Shwe`s residence and he will listen to America. Otherwise, nothing will be achieved by this new American policy, believe me.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Children’s Rights Celebrated in Naypyidaw

bullet US Calls for Dialogue between Suu Kyi and Junta

bullet UN Passes Resolutions on Burma Human Rights

bullet Myint Swe: The Tatmadaw’s Next Top Dog?

bullet Handcuffed Statue Has the Experts Talking

bullet ‘Burma VJ’ Short-listed for Oscar

bullet Assessing the US-Asean Summit

bullet Coco Islands to Open for Tourism

bullet Global Fund Returns to Burma with Large Grant

bullet Mystery of the Handcuffed Statues


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.