SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




Burmese Dissidents, Activists Unhappy with Hun Sen


By SAW YAN NAING Tuesday, October 27, 2009

COMMENTS (11)
RECOMMEND (19)
E-MAIL
PRINT

Many Burmese are unhappy with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen’s recent comment comparing ousted Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra to detained democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Hun Sen made the remark during a meeting of the 15th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) Summit in Cha-am, Thailand, suggesting that the billionaire businessman who became one of Thailand’s most popular politicians before his ouster in a 2006 coup was—like Suu Kyi—a victim of political persecution.

At the summit meeting, Hun Sen said that Thaksin, who is in self-imposed exile, was welcome to live in Cambodia, and he would not be extradited, if requested by Thailand.

Win Tin, a senior member of the Burma’s main opposition party, the National League for Democracy, said he was upset over Hun Sen’s comparison.

“There is no reason to compare Thaksin and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi,” he said.
“As a prime minister, Hun Sen must know that these two persons are different.”

Debbie Stothard, the coordinator of the Alternative Asean Network on Burma, said, “It’s a terrible joke to compare Thaksin Shinawatra to Suu Kyi.”

A Burmese university student at Ramkhamhaeng University in Bangkok, Kyaw Linn Oo, said Hun Sen may have meant that both Thaksin and Suu Kyi were very popular and received widespread political support.

However, he said Suu Kyi has sacrificed for democracy, and she was not comparable to Thaksin, who went into exile after he was convicted of corruption following the coup. Suu Kyi has spent 14 of the past 20 years in detention. While in office, Thaksin was widely criticized for his “War against Drugs,” in which thousands of people died in extra-judicial killings.

Kaung Kin, a Burmese poet and a student in Bangkok, said Hun Sen’s remark was a big mistake.

“Daw Suu [Suu Kyi] is a freedom fighter,” he said. “Thaksin was charged with corruption. Daw Suu is nonviolent. Supporters of Thaksin are violent.”



COMMENTS (11)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

pLan B Wrote:
30/10/2009
KO Aung Zaw, Ko Wai Moe,

Now we know why DASSK will be SPDC favorite trump card for years to come.

Ludu Wrote:
30/10/2009
To OMG,

How did you know Thaksin was the most corrupt person in Thailand? According to Thai government? Are you a member of yellow-shirts? We must jump out from black and white view. Why he was supported by numerous poor Thais? Yes, he cut hours of brothels, fought on drugs, changed constitution to let military less involved in politics.

Pokpong Lawansiri Wrote:
29/10/2009
The comment of Kaung Kin is too easy and an oversimplification of Thai politics.

The most important question that needs to be addressed is what led the supporters of Thaksin to turn to violence during the April riot? Was not it from years (since 2006) of the oppression of the post-military coup d'etat that has created such anger among them?

Was not it their inability to express themselves to the public for years (after the Thai Rak Thai Party and People's Power disbanded), forcing them to respond with such anger? Was not it the double standard of treatment between them and the People's Alliance of Democracy by many elite actors that created such anger from them?

Sometimes, Burmese activists and exiles need to understand Thai politics more thoroughly and in comprehensive manners. The black-and-white analysis like this article should never appear in such paper as The Irrawaddy.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
28/10/2009
I would like to ask Mr. Hun Sen, how dare you compare a national hero and freedom fighter lady with Mr. Thaksin, who was the most corrupt person in Thailand?

yebaw Wrote:
28/10/2009
The Cambodian PM made a wrong comparison between a fairy and a beast. Hun Sen has been enjoying power for many years but he is not an intellectual person; comparable to Than Shwe. How can he compare two persons who have different gender, different political thought, different status in term of honour and different ways of life?

Ex-PM Thaksin is notorious in corruption and a fugitive, while Daw Suu is honest, sincere and has a clean record.

Okkar Wrote:
28/10/2009
I'm a Burmese dissident and I have no issue with the remarks of Mr. Hun Sen. In fact, his remarks bring home some uncomfortable truths about Suu Kyi.

Like Thaksin, Suu Kyi is preferred candidate of the West, a product of Western cliques, who would happily endorse any US-led agenda under the pretext of democracy.

Although truth is sometime painful to accept, it is nonsense that Burmese dissidents should feel offended because Hun Sen compared Thaksin to Suu Kyi. The only people who are unhappy about this comment are those who want to hide the real face of Suu Kyi, a puppet of the West.

Are they afraid that the people of Myanmar will realise Suu Kyi's pro-West agendas and won't vote for her party?

shwe moe Wrote:
27/10/2009
Well, in the case of Hun Sen, "The Devil can quote scriptures" or a chameleon is in shining armor for the wrong cause.

Saha Wynnseree Wrote:
27/10/2009
Hun Sen showed his standard and true color by comparing Thaksin and Daw Suu. He has no idea about any one of them. He doesn't really know anything about Daw Aung San Su Kyi, as well as the infamous fugitive Thaksin. At the same time, he also insulted his host and Asean members by displaying his level of knowledge.

Ck You Wrote:
27/10/2009
I think that Thaksin and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi are different because Thaksin is a businessman, strong in business but as a policy leader not strong, whereas Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is strong on democracy and fights corruption in Burma.

Jerry Wrote:
27/10/2009
The university student forgot to mention that Thaksin was ousted in a coup, that he still has a popular mandate and that the courts were instructed just as the courts in Burma are instructed which verdict should be passed. The problem with Burmese exiles in Thailand is that they cannot be seen to be critical of the Thai government, therefore it is not surprising that they join the bandwagon of critics.

Thai courts have always been able and willing to pass verdicts on mocked up charges. Aung Suu might have sacrificed her freedom but that does not mean that cases are not comparable.

Teeru Wrote:
27/10/2009
I so so so agree with you.





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet Children’s Rights Celebrated in Naypyidaw

bullet US Calls for Dialogue between Suu Kyi and Junta

bullet UN Passes Resolutions on Burma Human Rights

bullet Myint Swe: The Tatmadaw’s Next Top Dog?

bullet Handcuffed Statue Has the Experts Talking

bullet ‘Burma VJ’ Short-listed for Oscar

bullet Assessing the US-Asean Summit

bullet Coco Islands to Open for Tourism

bullet Global Fund Returns to Burma with Large Grant

bullet Mystery of the Handcuffed Statues


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.