SUBSCRIBE|ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION




The New Constitution and the Transfer of Power


By HTET AUNG Sunday, September 27, 2009

COMMENTS (0)
RECOMMEND (59)
E-MAIL
PRINT

After two decades of military rule, Burma’s State Peace and Development Council is now working to consolidate its military rule through parliamentary elections and the restoration of a civilian government in 2010.

The country’s prolong political deadlock began with the SPDC’s rebuff of the 1990 election results in which the majority of voters chose candidates of the National League for Democracy.

The Burmese people have serious doubts about whether the SPDC will conduct a free and fair election and respect the votes cast in the 2010 election.

The constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar [Burma], which was written by the junta’s hand-picked delegates and approved in a 2008 referendum, included an important chapter titled “Transitory Provisions,” which is intended to guide the post-election process for the transfer of power.
 
However, in spite of a 14-year National Convention to draw up the new constitution, the chapter is largely based on Article 195, 196, 199 and 202 of the “General Provisions” of the 1974 socialist constitution. In addition, it lacks important details on the transfer of power process to a civilian government.

One provision the junta didn’t overlook, however, was a constitutional guarantee to protect the military government from any legal action for its gross violations of human rights, such as extra judiciary killings, disappearances and arbitrary detentions such as the fourth house arrest of the democratic leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Section 445 of the constitution states: “No proceeding shall be instituted against the said Councils (the SPDC and its former State Law and Order Restoration Council) or any member thereof or any member of the Government, in respect of any act done in the execution of their respective duties.”

Uncertain Post-election Transition

After the 2010 election, the constitution will come into operation at the first session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (a Union Parliament combined with Pyithu or People Hluttaw and Amyotha or Nationalities Hluttaw). However, the SPDC “shall continue to exercise State sovereignty before this Constitution comes into operation,” according to the Section 442 of the Transitory Provisions.

In his recent book, “The State in Myanmar,” Prof Robert H. Taylor, a well-known pro-junta Western scholar, analyzed the constitution and concluded: “The new constitution will come into effect from the first meeting of the Pyihtaurnsu Hluttaw…In the meantime, the SPDC will remain in power.”

Therefore, Section 442 may lead some constitutional observers to the conclusion that the SPDC will relinquish its power a few months after the election because the first session of Pyidaungsu Hluttaw must convene within 15 days after the first session of Pyithu Hluttaw, which also must convene within 90 days after the commencement of the general election, according to Section 78 and 123.

Taylor offered no further analysis on the issue of power transfer through his comparative view of the constitution. The SPDC’s “seven-step roadmap,” however, offered some clues to what might transpire.

According to the roadmap, holding an election and parliamentary sessions are the fifth and sixth steps of the roadmap. The SPDC will carry out the roadmap’s seventh step: “Building a modern, developed and democratic nation by the state leaders elected by the Hluttaw, and the government and other central organ formed by the Hluttaw.”

Moreover, one important factor that is often overlooked is the SPDC’s order 1/90 issued in 1990 which is still in operation as stated in Section 447: “Existing rules, regulations, by-laws, notifications, orders, directives and procedures shall remain in operation in so far as they are not contrary to this Constitution until and unless they are repealed or amended by the Union Government.”


Order 1/90 said: “It is hardly necessary to clarify the fact that a political party cannot automatically obtain the three aspects of State power – legislative power, executive power and judicial power just because a Pyithu Hluttaw has come into being.”

Therefore, it appears that the SPDC will hold its sovereign power until the presidential election and the formation of all the executive and judicial bodies have been completed throughout the country.

Although Section 60/f of the constitution said that necessary law shall be enacted for the election of the president, it does not stipulate in Section 399 whether the duties of the Election Commission will include either the enacting of the law or holding the election.


Therefore, the first important task of the Hluttaws, as stated in the seventh step of the roadmap, would be to enact the presidential election law, but no timeframe was set in the constitution for drafting the law and holding the election.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (0)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 





Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

More Articles in This Section


bullet A State-run ‘Market Economy’

bullet Nudging the Junta toward Democracy

bullet Common Grounds for Dialogue

bullet The 'Burmese Way' to a 'Disciplined Flourishing Democracy'

bullet Panglong Agreement, Federal Principles and the 2008 Constitution

bullet Coming to the Bargaining Table

bullet 1990 Election Lessons for the NLD

bullet Electoral System: A Cause for Stability or Instability?

bullet Opposition-backed Constitutional Amendments will be Difficult

bullet Burma’s New Constitution Privileges Soldiers above Civilians


 

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.